WV Civil Rights Lawyer

Police Misconduct, Civil Rights Law

Media Coverage

Yesterday I attended a hearing in a high profile case.  It’s one of those cases where there is public outrage at what happened – one of those cases where the public gets a lynch-mob mentality and the prosecutor and law enforcement press hard for the toughest conviction(s) which they believe they can get (regardless of whether they are justified).  There was a news camera in the courtroom.  This was not my first case to be followed by local news cameras.

Every single time I have a high profile criminal case, I am awed by the lack of neutrality by the press.  They completely ignore the constitution.  They ignore the facts.  They convict people in the media.  They infect the potential jury pool with ignorance, and with the law enforcement mentality that everyone they charge is guilty, and that the public is being served by the prosecution.

How is someone, especially in a case like this, supposed to get a fair trial?  Good luck on getting a change of venue.  It hasn’t happened for me yet, and I have had some good cases for it.

It’s amazing that as a large mass, the public craves news of prosecutions and convictions.  Juries who acquit defendants are publicly and privately condemned.  Prosecutors who do not meet their expectations for severe punishment and mass incarceration are voted out of office (or at least campaigned against).  Yet, when you separate out 12 individuals and intimately discuss a case with them, and justice in general, reason once again reasserts itself into the situation.  Young and old.  Republican and Democrat.  Liberal and Conservative.  The jury system is a protection against the lynch mob.  The lynch mob is blinded to the constitution and to the truth.  It operates on blind passion and ignorance.

Local news media feeds that monster everyday.  Just watch local news.  They talk about this conviction, and that conviction, and that this man will go to prison for X amount of years, and so on and so forth.  You never read or hear about acquittals, unless of course it is set in the context of some slimy lawyer getting a guilty person off on a technicality.

– John H. Bryan

Advertisements

March 16, 2010 - Posted by | Uncategorized

3 Comments »

  1. I second that! With passion and conviction, you certainly illuminate this fraud well, but are not the media outlets looking out for our own best interests? Of course, not, only their own, for the following quotation proves that the media(s) do feed that “monster” every day with their Rhetoric of ‘Doom’:

    “Civilization, in fact, grows more maudlin and hysterical; especially under democracy it tends to degenerate into a mere combat of crazes; the whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by an endless series of hobgoblins, most of them imaginary.”*
    * H.L. Mencken, In Defense of Women (New York: Knopf, 1918), p. 53.

    This appears to be exactly what the media aim their microphones toward.

    Beau

    Comment by Beau Bryan | March 25, 2010 | Reply

  2. It will never be fair.

    Comment by Robert Fortney | May 7, 2010 | Reply

  3. […] coverage of criminal cases in WV and mercy for good people Several years ago, and again recently, I discussed my frustration at the lack of impartial coverage of high profile criminal cases in […]

    Pingback by Media coverage of criminal cases in WV and mercy for good people « WV Criminal Lawyer | November 17, 2010 | Reply


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: