Today there was an article in the Charleston Gazette about the Mark Plants mess in Kanawha County.
On Wednesday, Judge Duke Bloom barred Prosecutor Mark Plants’ office from handling cases involving child abuse and neglect, violent crimes against children by their parent, guardian or custodian and criminal violations of protective orders . . . .
The ruling is in response to a petition from the city of Charleston asking that Plants be disqualified from hearing cases brought by the Charleston Police Department.
Lawyers with the state Office of Disciplinary Counsel filed a petition with the state Supreme Court asking that Plants be immediately suspended or disqualified from prosecuting domestic-violence cases involving parents and minor children. The ODC’s petition said Plants’ belief that the allegations against him aren’t a crime creates a conflict of interest for his office. The Supreme Court has scheduled a hearing on the matter for May 5.
So you have a city applying to a judge to disqualify the elected prosecutor from hearing certain cases, based on pending criminal charges. Domestic violence accusations pop up from time to time in the personal lives of police officers. The MO, in my experience, is that they are disarmed and given a desk job until the situation is resolved. I wonder if the employer, e.g., the City of XYZ, has ever sought to protect the rights of the alleged victims/accusers in domestic violence cases where the investigating officers have had their own history of accusations? And do they have standing to even have a say in the matter? After all, the county prosecutor is a position elected by the citizens of the county. Also, what about all the people who have previously been prosecuted for these types of crimes by Mr. Plants, or his office? Do they now have some right to have their case reopened, or thrown out?
From the Charleston Gazette this morning, there is an article about a Dunbar, West Virginia, police officer – George Ike Radar – who was charged with domestic battery for slapping his wife 20 times and pointing his finger into her chest.
Bravo to State Trooper E.B. McClung for arresting this jerk. But shame on the magistrate for letting him out on a $1,000 recognizance bond, which in my opinion is preferential treatment based on his status as a police officer.
The Dunbar police chief was quoted in the article as saying “everyone is innocent until proven guilty, and we need to get to the facts.” Since when do cops believe in the presumption of innocence? When one of them are charged themselves, that’s when…
Statistics (and personal observation) show that the wives of many law enforcement officers are the most battered and abused women in this country. Cops protect their own, and they know how to manipulate and abuse the system.
In fact, I was in court yesterday representing the wife of a law enforcement officer who, in preparation for filing a divorce, had his buddy law enforcement officer come over and arrest his wife for touching him in the chest. And you can be sure that she wasn’t given a $1,000 personal recognizance bond (which means they do not actually have to come up with any money). No, she was given a $2,500 cash bond, which means that she had to come up with cash or go to jail. And guess what? She was not allowed to retrieve any money or belongings from home, because (again, in preparation for his filing divorce) he immediately filed a domestic violence petition at the same time, which means that a protective order is placed into effect, and she cannot go home or see her kids.
You better believe that many cops actually are above the law, and they will not hesitate to lie or manufacture evidence to have their buddies arrest you. Then, guess what? The magistrates are also buddies with the cops, so you get a high cash bond and general unfairness in the courtroom. Then the prosecutors are also buddies with the cops and would rather put your case in front of the jury instead of pissing off the cops by dismissing the case.
Yesterday, the assistant prosecutor who appeared offered to dismiss the criminal charge if my client withdrew several motions and a hearing date in the former-couple’s divorce case! Is that not disgusting? Is that not a gross abuse of power? Is that not a violation of human rights?
When I called a spade a spade and told the assistant prosecutor that she should be ashamed of what she was doing, she said “how dare you… I have never… I have never… (blah, blah, blah).” That is actually the second time that a female prosecutor has said that to me. The first time it was said I probably deserved it, but not this time. I guess they take themselves a little more seriously than the male prosecutors. Or maybe they just refuse to sympathize with the female victims of their law enforcement buddies.
Can a cop in West Virginia really have his wife arrested and use the prosecutor to negotiate a better divorce settlement for him? Absolutely.
You can read the full article about the Dunbar officer here.
– John H. Bryan, West Virginia Attorney.
The Charleston Taco Bell shooting last Saturday, which is detailed in the Charleston Daily Mail here, is not one that will likely fade from memory. The perpetrator of this crime, Desmond Clark, gives new meaning to the term “bad apple,” and he has indeed just about ruined the probation system and the domestic violence petition system – for everyone.
I was talking to a former prosecutor and legislator the other day who was up-in-arms about this. Defense attorneys now are going to have an extremely hard time getting probation for their clients, especially in those domestic-related cases, which oftentimes are the same cases that subside on the flimsiest of evidence.
And for those of us who practice divorce and family law, the times just got tougher. What magistrate is going to deny a protective order in any situation now? This legislator joked that in just about every ugly divorce he has seen, there are skid marks from the marital home to the magistrate court, where the first spouse there takes out a domestic violence petition against the other. Then, what family law judge is going to release or dismiss the protective order, despite the sufficiency of the evidence? The end result is that the loser of the race to magistrate court ends up getting ousted from their house/belongings/children until the divorce is finalized.
So, the legislature has realized this system of domestic violence petitions is broken and largely abused. But, what can they do about it? For every 999 times this system is abused and misused, there is some legitimate victim out there like this poor woman who was murdered in the Taco Bell. But then again, she had a protective order in effect at the time she was murdered, and it didn’t help her very much.
– John H. Bryan, West Virginia Attorney.
This is a story that I will detail in a later post if need be, but it rises to the situation where the public should be informed of this massive abuse of authority.
A southern West Virginia Chief of Police, who is a big guy and also a military veteran, had his little wife arrested by a buddy law enforcement officer for “domestic assault,” taken into physical custody, after which she was able to bond out with a $5,000 cash bond. For those of you who don’t know, $5,000 is the average bond for felonies in southern West Virginia.
This police chief then filed for divorce and refused to drop the frivolous criminal charge against her unless she agreed to his terms for the divorce. This story is continuing and may be updated based on future actions taken by the law enforcement officer.
– John H. Bryan, West Virginia Attorney.
From the Register-Herald:
Assistant prosecutor says he’s still on the job
Well, well, well. The tables have turned. This man requested to be appointed special prosecutor to the Greebrier County Sawyers case (see my previous posts) and pushed the grand jury for a felony battery charge. Now maybe a special prosecutor needs to be appointed and bring his charge before a special grand jury and try to indict him on a felony charge. – John H. Bryan, West Virginia Criminal Defense Attorney.
Despite reports, Dotson says he has not resigned or been fired after arrest
By Christian Giggenbach
A Braxton County assistant prosecutor said Thursday he has neither resigned nor been fired from his position despite at least two separate news reports that indicated otherwise after he was arrested on a domestic assault charge last weekend.
Nicholas County Sheriff’s Deputy D.J. Holdren arrested Daniel Dotson Sunday at his Webster County home following an alleged incident with his wife at a Craigsville convenience store. Officials at Central Regional Jail in Flatwoods confirmed Dotson was photographed and processed on a domestic assault charge and was released after posting $2,000 bond.
The Charleston Gazette and Charleson Daiy Mail reported Thursday that Dotson had left his position as an assistant prosecutor under Braxton County Prosecutor Bill Martin. The Braxton Citizen News also published a story that Dotson was “no longer an employee” of Martin’s office, and the Pocahontas Times published the Braxton Citizens News story about Dotson on its Web site.
When reached by phone Thursday, Dotson denied those claims.
“Regardless of what was in the paper, I have not been terminated and I have been staying out of the office for a while until I can take care of other matters,” he said.
Martin did not return phone messages left with his secretary Thursday.
Dotson, who has been prosecuting cases since 1989 and was elected Webster County prosecutor in 1996, was appointed special prosecutor by the state Supreme Court last year in the case of a Greenbrier County sheriff’s deputy accused of beating county Prosecutor Kevin Hanson. The deputy, Kevin Sawyers, was indicted last week by a special grand jury on a misdemeanor battery charge.
“This will not affect my status as the special prosecutor in the Greenbrier County case,” Dotson said.
The director of the West Virginia Prosecuting Attorneys Institute in Charleston said Thursday that Dotson was individually named special prosecutor in the Greenbrier case and only an order by a circuit court judge could remove him.
A special judge had not been named to hear the case as of late Thursday. Both Greenbrier County circuit court judges asked to be recused from the case.
Dotson, who was also named special prosecutor in a Pocahontas County case involving a sherif’f’s deputy, is scheduled to appear in court there for a hearing this morning. Dotson said he will be present for the hearing.
Although Dotson declined to specifically talk about the charges pending against him in Nicholas County, he did indicate his innocence.
“I am ready to defend myself in a court of law concerning those charges,” Dotson said.
— E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Civil Liability
- Computer Crimes
- Concealed Weapons
- Criminal Records
- Denial of Medical Care
- Domestic Violence
- Excessive Force
- Financial Abuse of Elderly
- Forensic Labs
- Governmental Liability
- Grand Juries
- History Series
- John H. Bryan
- Judicial Misconduct
- Law Office Tech
- Law School
- Media Coverage
- Medical Examiners
- Money Laundering
- motions for change of venue
- Negligent Homicide
- Plea Agreements
- Police Misconduct
- Preliminary Hearings
- Pretrial Hearings
- Right to Speedy Trial
- Searches and Seizures
- Self Defense
- Sex Crimes
- Sex Offender Registration
- State Agencies
- United Bank Lawsuit
- Vehicular Crimes
- West Virginia Concealed Carry Laws
- West Virginia Gun Laws
- White Collar Crime
- Wildlife Violations